Goal Setting and Persistence
A brief literature review completed in the spring of 2016, P Callahan.
A short "Hero's Journey" to perhaps make the notion of goal setting a more memorable experience.
There is something very powerful about writing a goal. Writing is a process that forces both clarification and commitment. I prefer blue ink. That’s a color that makes me want to write. The permanence of ink requires me to take the time to organize my thoughts into a statement that is concise and understandable. The goal becomes worthy of my time and effort.
I have a plan, a map of my journey.
My preference is to keep a goal statement brief and to-the-point. Reduce a complex task into a simple phrase. I don’t need to worry the details, not yet, anyway. Put limitations to the goal. Limitations make the goal manageable allowing me to determine the what and when of completion. “Hike the Long Trail over the next month.” Is that doable I ask myself. There is nothing to be gained in setting myself up for failure.
A journey is rarely completed in a single step. A step sends us in a direction. The step only has meaning when it has the limitations of direction and distance. Limitation can be a freedom that provides definition, a detail that measures fulfillment or completion.
Goals and Goal setting have a history of research spanning decades and disciplines that include leadership,
education and psychology. The notion of goal setting emerged as a recognition of the role of conscious intent
as a motivational cause.1,2,3
Given its early history in industrial-organizational (I/O) psychology, goal setting might be broadly defined as
the conscious development of a plan to guide a person or group toward a goal or desired end-point, often within
some time span. Goal-setting theory considers the impact of motivation, that is, the desire and intent to reach
a goal. It implies discontent with the present condition. And, as long as the goal is attainable, there are no
conflicting goals, and there is a commitment to the goal, then there is a relationship between goal difficulty
and goal performance. This relationship, between goal difficulty and goal performance, contends that harder
goals are more motivating than easier goals because they require one to attain more in order to be
satisfied.4,5
There are also mediators or mechanisms through which goal setting affects performance. Specifically, goals are
motivators, impact persistence, focus attention, and activate old and new knowledge and strategies.6
Other elements or moderators also impact goal setting. Receiving adequate feedback to track progress. Establishing
goal commitment that is enhanced by self-efficacy (belief in one's ability to complete tasks and reach a goal)
and goal importance. Recognizing that task complexity is limited by task knowledge, that is, task knowledge is
more difficult to acquire as the tasks become more complex. And, understanding situational constraints that
limit, such as dealing with excess work without having sufficient resources.7
When goals are established by the individual, those individuals who demonstrate higher self-efficacy set more
demanding goals than those individuals with lower self-efficacy. Further, the more self-efficacious individuals
demonstrate a greater goal commitment and find better strategies to attain the goals.8 This is seen in the
context of learning goals. Learners are affected by perceived goal progress leading to goal attainment. Goal
setting and self-efficacy are affected by self-observation, self-judgment, and self-reaction.9
The effects of self-efficacy, grade goal, and effort regulation emerge as strong predictors of course grades
and Grade Point Average (GPA).10,11 Learners who set both near and longterm grade goals show higher GPA.12
Grit has appeared as a predictor of academic success. It is defined as perseverance and passion for long-term
goals, or the effort and interest exercised toward a set goal and positively sustained throughout the course
of reaching that goal. Grit is considered a trait that can be nurtured to improve self-regulation and goal
success.13,14,15
Finally, as a psychological construct, the framing of goal setting becomes pivotal. For example, individuals
who perceive the goal to be a challenge show better performance than those individuals who perceive the goal
to be threatening and potentially leading to failure.16 Additionally, setting specific difficult goals leads
to better performance than no goals or vague goals, such as "do your best.”17 This is evidenced in behavioral
and physical health programs, such as goal coaching as an approach to physical rehabilitation, dietary and
exercise programs, personal development, and goal attainment.18,19,20,21
Process of Goal Setting
Goals can range from small to big depending upon individual perception and the resources needed to meet the
goal. Getting out of bed in the morning can be a goal, as can writing and presenting a complex report. Making
the effort to smile at people can be a goal, as can showing people that we care about them. We may set dozens
of goals every day, but may not be fully aware of the implications of the act nor the process we go through to
attain the goal. Being able to create an attainable goal and the steps to achieve that goal has been found to
increase our sense of self-efficacy, thus producing a positive loop leading to an even greater likelihood of
success.22,23,24,25
The goal implications can have unexpected consequences. For example, unrealistic goals can lead to depression
and can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure.26 If goals are too easily attainable, then we can become
bored and uninspired reaching the goal. Attainment can be influenced by whether the goals are imposed on us or
if we have some say in the development of the goal.27,28
It is important to differentiate between the notion of goal commitment from that of goal acceptance.29 We may
accept that studying for classes is a goal that we have to make to reach the larger goal of graduating from our
program of studies. If, however, we are not committed to studying on a daily basis we may fail to graduate.
There are intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to achieving a goal.30,31 That is, we may have internal
(intrinsic) motivation to achieve a certain goal, when there is no external (extrinsic) motivation to do so.
Alternatively there may be little intrinsic motivation, but lots of external motivation to accomplish a goal.
Most often our goal setting is derived from some combination of all these factors. Awareness of these factors
better permits us to develop a viable goal and the steps needed to attain the goal.
Time Management
Effective time management is problematic for most people and it becomes more complicated when one is balancing
family, exercise, social obligations, education studies and a job. Students who perceive control of their time
report greater performance and life satisfaction, and less role overload and stress.32 Time management is shown
to have a greater buffering effect on academic stress than leisure activities.33 Engaging in some time
management behaviors may have beneficial effects on stress and job satisfaction.34,35
A goal of time management is to blend lifestyle with goal setting. A commonly used process is, through a series
of steps, to identify how you are currently allocating your time and then perform an optimizing process to
better address your activity and time needs. The optimizing process results in a “calendar” or planner that
allows you to identify daily routines as well as when special events impact your daily routines. By identifying
and compartmentalizing your routines and identifying important activity dates, you can establish boundaries
that ultimately permit you to enjoy guilt-free personal time without the stressful thought of “I should be
doing …”
Using a notebook, spreadsheet, word processor, or other recording device, create a daily calendar noting by
unit of time (hourly, 30 minutes, or 15 minutes) the activity you are performing. Maintain this calendar for
one week.
| | | | |
|---|
| Time | Monday | Tuesday | Weds | ... |
| 5:00 | wake | wake | wake | ... |
| 5:15 | feed pet | feed pet | feed pet | ... |
| 5:30 | jog | | jog | ... |
| 6:00 | | shower | | ... |
| 6:15 | shower | breakfast | shower | ... |
| 6:30 | breakfast | read newspaper | breakfast | ... |
At the end of one week, analyze the use of your time by identifying common activities or tasks and the time
spent on these. Activities to consider should include “free time” for family or social activities, classes,
work, study, meals and preparation, exercise, and chores. The intent of this weeklong analysis is to create an
organized weeklong calendar or a planner that indicates time spent on key activities. For example, identify an
adequate amount of “free time” while assuring that you put your most mentally demanding tasks into time slots
that make the best use your mental and physical resources. Your planner should be a tool that accommodates
your lifestyle.
The week-long calendar of organized time situates the recurring activities appearing in your week-long time l
og such that your days are presented in an optimized manner allowing repetitive activities to be identified.
Activities to consider should include “free time” for you, family, and social activities. Also consider work,
meals and preparation, exercise, studies, and chores.
Task goals and the steps to attain the goal are elements that may or may not immediately appear within the
organized weekly calendar, but are added as they arise. Consider setting goals and objectives for work
projects. These can be blended into the organized weekly calendar to become a daily planner.
Blend the activities of task goals and objectives and the week-long calendar of organized time into an
adaptable daily planner.
The next step is to translate this information into some sort of daily planner. Your planner should be a tool
that accommodates your lifestyle. In its simplest form consider using a shirt pocket planner notebook, a wall
calendar, a commercially printed daily planner with calendar, or a software application (app) that runs on
your cell phone and is shared with others. Pick the tool that you will use. Time management provides
opportunity to enact goal setting.
A Method for Goal Setting
A frequent term used in psychology is successive approximation or an ongoing shaping of behavior towards a
desired end.36 The same can be said for the goal setting. A goal is often defined as the conscious development
of a plan to guide a person or group toward the goal or desired end-point. It is important to develop a
realistic goal along with the smaller, more manageable, informative steps required to attain the goal.
These steps or objectives have purpose. Steps can help eliminate goal ambiguity by providing limitations to
the broader goal statement. They can introduce more flexibility in attaining the goal.37,38
Steps provide a mechanism for ongoing self-evaluation. They provide opportunities for “rewards” along the way
to attaining the larger goal. Too often people focus only on the goal and miss the intrinsic and extrinsic
values associated with satisfying the smaller steps towards meeting their goal.
Are there other options for goal setting? While the method described does provide the how-to basics of goal
setting, finding other tools, such as dedicated goal setting apps might be beneficial. Consider too, other
tools such as acronyms that might prompt you. The SMART acronym captures some of the elements of successful
goal setting from a management context. That is, goals are Specific (defined intent), Measurable (limits
are established), Assignable (who is involved), Realistic (attainable), and Time Related (expected
completion).39 The goal, of course, is to complete the goal setting and if you should find a more appropriate
tool that moves you to completion, then use it.
References
1. Mace, Cecil Alec. "Incentives. Some Experimental Studies." Industrial Health Research Board Report. Medical Research Council 72 (1935).
2. Ryan, Thomas Arthur, and Patricia Cain Smith. "Principles of industrial psychology." (1954).
3. McClelland, David C., John W. Atkinson, Russell A. Clark, and Edgar L. Lowell. "The Achievement Motive (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953)." McClellandThe Achievement Motive1953 (1955).
4. Locke, Edwin A. "Motivation through conscious goal setting." Applied and Preventive Psychology 5, no. 2 (1996): 117-124.
5. Locke, Edwin. "Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge." Applied Psychology 49, no. 3 (2000): 408-429.
6. Locke, Edwin A., and Gary P. Latham. "Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey." American psychologist 57, no. 9 (2002): 705.
7. Locke, Edwin A., and Gary P. Latham. "New directions in goal-setting theory." Current directions in psychological science 15, no. 5 (2006): 265-268.
8. Locke, E. "latham GP. 1990. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance." Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice–Hall (81).
9. Schunk, Dale H. "Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning." Educational psychologist 25, no. 1 (1990): 71-86.
10. Zimmerman, Barry J., Albert Bandura, and Manuel Martinez-Pons. "Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting." American educational research journal 29, no. 3 (1992): 663-676.
11. Richardson, Michelle, Charles Abraham, and Rod Bond. "Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis." a Psychological bulletin 138, no. 2 (2012): 353.
12. Latham, Gary P., and Travor C. Brown. "The effect of learning vs. outcome goals on self‐Efficacy, satisfaction and performance in an MBA program." Applied Psychology 55, no. 4 (2006): 606-623.
13. Duckworth, Angela Lee, and Patrick D. Quinn. "Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S)." Journal of personality assessment 91, no. 2 (2009): 166-174.
14. Duckworth, Angela L., Christopher Peterson, Michael D. Matthews, and Dennis R. Kelly. "Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals." Journal of personality and social psychology 92, no. 6 (2007): 1087.
15. Perez, Madeline. "Obtaining Academic Success: Nurturing Grit in Students.”
16. Drach-Zahavy, Anat, and Miriam Erez. "Challenge versus threat effects on the goal–performance relationship." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88, no. 2 (2002): 667-682.
17. Strecher, Victor J., Gerard H. Seijts, Gerjo J. Kok, Gary P. Latham, Russell Glasgow, Brenda DeVellis, Ree M. Meertens, and David W. Bulger. "Goal setting as a strategy for health behavior change." Health Education & Behavior 22, no. 2 (1995): 190-200.
18. Hurn, Jane, Ian Kneebone, and Mark Cropley. "Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review." Clinical rehabilitation 20, no. 9 (2006): 756-772.
19. Grant, Anthony M. "The impact of life coaching on goal attainment, metacognition and mental health." Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 31, no. 3 (2003): 253-263.
20. Pearson, Erin S. "Goal setting as a health behavior change strategy in overweight and obese adults: a systematic literature review examining intervention components." Patient education and counseling 87, no. 1 (2012): 32-42.
21. Shilts, Mical Kay, Marcel Horowitz, and Marilyn S. Townsend. "Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: a review of the literature." American Journal of Health Promotion 19, no. 2 (2004): 81-93.
22. Albert Bandura and E. A. Locke, “Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited,” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 no. 1 (2003): 87-99.
23. Albert Bandura and Dale A. Schunk, “Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 no. 3 (1981): 586-598.
24. M. E. Gist, “Self-efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management,” Academy of Management Review 12 no. 3 (1987): 472-485.
25. Edwin A. Locke and Gary F. Latham, “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35 Year Odyssey,” American Psychologist 57 no. 9 (2002): 705-717.
26. J. L. Schwartz, “Relationship Between Goal Discrepancy and Depression,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42 no. 2 (1974): 309.
27. Michael A. Campion and Robert G. Lord, “A Control Systems Conceptualization of Goal Setting Process,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30 (1982): 265-287.
28. J. R. Hollenbeck and C. R. Williams, “Goal Importance, Self-focus and the Goal-Setting Process,” Journal of Applied Psychology 72 no. 2 (1987): 204-211.
29. J. R. Hollenbeck and H. J. Klein, “Goal Commitment and the Goal-Setting Process: Problems, Prospects, and Proposals for Future Research,” Journal of Applied Psychology 72 no. 2 (1987): 212-220.
30. Gary P. Latham and Edwin A. Locke, “New Developments in and Directions for Goal-Setting Research,” European Psychologist 12 no. 4 (2007): 290-300.
31. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci, “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being,” American Psychologist 55 (2000): 68-78.
32. Macan, Therese H., Comila Shahani, Robert L. Dipboye, and Amanda P. Phillips. "College students' time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress." Journal of educational psychology 82, no. 4 (1990): 760.
33. Misra, Ranjita, and Michelle McKean. "College students' academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction." American Journal of Health Studies 16, no. 1 (2000): 41.
34. Macan, Therese Hoff. "Time management: Test of a process model." Journal of applied psychology 79, no. 3 (1994): 381.
35. Jex, Steve M., and Tina C. Elacqua. "Time management as a moderator of relations between stressors and employee strain." Work & Stress 13, no. 2 (1999): 182-191.
36. David Watson, “Shaping by Successive Approximations,” ed. L. T. Benjamin Jr. and K. D. Lowman, vol. 2 of Activities Handbook for the Teaching of Psychology (Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 1981).
37. Seymour L. Zelen, “Goal-Setting Rigidity in an Ambiguous Situation,” Journal of Consulting Psychology 19 no. 5 (1955): 395-399.
38. Paul H. White, M. M. Kjelgaard and S. G. Harkins, “Testing the Contribution of Self-Evaluation to Goal-Setting Effects,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 no. 1 (1995): 69-79.
39. Doran, George T. “There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives." Management review 70, no. 11 (1981): 35-36.
